The #2 Virginia men's basketball team's defense is ranked first in the country, allowing only 50.8 points per game, with #1 Kentucky at their heels at 51.8. But how historically low is that number?
Last year UVA led the nation in this category as well, but at 55.7 points per game. The year before the leader was Stephen F. Austin at 51.2. You have to go all the way back to 1992 to find a stingier defense, when Princeton held its opponents to a mere 48 points a game. (That is roughly 325 teams in the country for 22 years, or over 7,100 total seasons before finding a better defense.) In 1992, UVA's coach Tony Bennett was playing in college. Here is the list of the leaders by year:
Tony Bennett fans should recognize a couple of those teams, including his 2009 Washington State team and his father Dick Bennett’s 2001 Wisconsin team.
How about just looking at Virginia’s history? How does this year’s Cavaliers squad compare to the 109 other seasons of UVA basketball history through 23 games? Bennett’s 2012 and 2013 teams were smothering defenses as well, but with a slightly higher average of 53 points per game. Earlier coaches Dave Leitao and Pete Gillen were not known for defense and their teams averaged 72 points a game. You would think the great Ralph Sampson would have contributed to historic defensive teams as well, but they allowed 62 points a game. Even the ‘60s UVA teams allowed an average of 80 points a game. That is 60% more scoring allowed per game even without a shot clock or 3 point line. That could be why the program went 69-176 (.281) that decade. You have to go all the way back to the 1946 season to find a Virginia team giving up less than 50 points a game.
Check out the results from that year:
Talk about an easy schedule. UNC and Duke only once? VMI and W&L twice?
(Interestingly enough a lot of the opponents around that time were military schools due to WWII, so UVA would play against air bases and naval training centers. I can only imagine what losing to “N.C. Pre-Flight School” and “Camp Lee” did to Virginia's RPI in 1943.)
The teams in the 1920s played games with scores only in the 20’s, so this year’s Virginia team is not going to break any all-time records, but they still have a chance to finish as the best Wahoo defense in almost 70 years.
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
UVa Men's Basketball Keeps Rolling On
UVa’s basketball team is having another historic season. The Hoos are undefeated so far at 17-0 and are ranked #2 in the country. They are off to their best start in 34 years and have not been ranked this high since 1983. In fact, since January 18th of last year, Virginia has gone 35-2, best in the nation.
The Cavaliers have achieved this record due to their dominant defense, which is #1 in the country in points allowed per game and #2 in field goal percentage. Meanwhile, the offense has been efficient as well, ranked #24 in FG% and #4 in KenPom offense efficiency ratings.
Last season, UVa won the ACC regular season and tournament titles for the first time ever, and will have a tough time repeating this year. Next week the Wahoos start a three game stretch against #5 Duke, at #15 North Carolina, and #10 Louisville.
In fact, the Duke game is such a big match-up that ESPN’s traveling pregame show, “College Gameday,” will be in Charlottesville for the first time ever for that game.
Meanwhile, Kentucky is the other undefeated team in the country, and is ranked #1, garnering lots of media attention. The Wildcats are a team made up of mostly All-American freshman looking to go to the NBA after their one year, while UVa is comprised of mostly upperclassmen with more aspirations towards graduation than the pros. It would make for an interesting title game if these two top teams make it that far.
Let’s Go Hoos!
Monday, November 17, 2014
Cleveland Cavaliers Already Swooning Over Joe Harris
When my favorite NBA team, the Cleveland Cavaliers, drafted former Virginia Cavalier Joe Harris in June, I was ecstatic. Not only was I excited that the star of the UVa team that won an ACC title for the first time in 30 years was being drafted into the NBA, but he was going to Cleveland as well. After the Cavaliers added Lebron James, Kevin Love, Mike Miller, Shawn Marion, and James Jones, Cleveland became a title contender and I figured Joe Harris would relegated to the D League or only get playing time during blowouts. Last year only half of the second round picks even played in the NBA and only one of them had more than 40 minutes of total playing time and 15 points at this point of the season.
Luckily Joe Harris made the opening day roster, and even got some last minute playing time in three of Cleveland’s first five games. Then starting shooting guard Dion Waiters injured his back in the fifth game, allowing Harris to get extended minutes against New Orleans last week. The 23 year old rookie has not looked back since.
In the past three games, Harris has played an average of 20 minutes a game, hit 6 three pointers and has led the All-Star stacked team with a +/- of +65. In a close game against the Celtics, the second round pick played in the closing minutes including hitting a 3-pointer with 3 minutes to go. Against Atlanta over the weekend, Harris entered in the first quarter and drained two 3-pointers igniting the rout of the Hawks. Only two players chosen #25 or later in this year's draft have more minutes or points than Harris.
Here is some of the praise from the Cavaliers' coach David Blatt so far:
"He's a very, very positive worker, nose to the grindstone, doesn't say a whole lot, listens to the veteran guys, fits in with what we're doing and he plays as hard as he possibly can regardless of the situation. That's what you want. Joe brought energy; he brought commitment to both ends. Our scouting department did a heckuva job getting Joe with that pick"
Even the best player in the world is on the Joe Harris bandwagon:
"He was huge," Lebron James said. "Joe Harris is going to be a big piece for our team.”
Now there are reports that the former Virginia Cavalier star could be in the Cleveland Cavalier’s starting lineup soon.
“With the way he is progressing and as well as he is playing, Joe Harris will be the starting shooting guard sooner rather than later. Much sooner. As in within a couple of weeks (or less), one source with knowledge of the team’s thinking said. At least one member of the Cavs’ brain trust is already in favor of the switch.”
It has been quite the rise for a player who only people in Charlottesville were swooning about last year. I already have my jersey:
Labels:
#Swoon,
Cavaliers,
Cleveland,
Joe Harris,
Lebron James,
NBA,
NBA Draft,
UVA,
Virginia
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Are The Nationals World Series Favorites?
For the second time in three years the Washington Nationals are in the playoffs! Two seasons ago, Washington was a team happy to be there and lost in the first round in heart breaking fashion. Now they are more experienced and are one of the favorites to win the World Series. Here are some reasons why the Nationals could bring DC its first baseball title in 90 years.
- They lead the majors in team ERA, starting pitcher ERA, and are second in bullpen ERA
- They set an all-time record for strikeout to walk ratio at 3.66-1
- They are in the top four in the NL in runs scored, home runs and on base percentage
- They are coming into the playoffs peaking at the right time, having won 15 of 20 and 21 of 30, both tops in the MLB, and ended the season on their first ever no-hitter
- Drew Storen reclaimed his closer role in early September and converted 10 consecutive save opportunities and hasn’t given up an earned run in 23 appearances
- Even the experts are picking the Nat’s to win it all. (11 of 15 on ESPN and 2 of 5 on Fox)
What’s preventing the Nationals from cruising all the way to a title? Oh yea, there are other teams in the playoffs.
- The Nats are only 17-20 against the teams that made the playoffs, a .459 winning percentage which is second to worst of the 10 teams
- They have been outscored 159-131 against playoff teams, a -28 margin that is third worst
So while Washington has put up great stats and look like the favorite on paper, I am a little hesitant to crown them champs already.
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Lebron James and Peyton Manning Are One in the Same
ESPN posted an interesting article about Lebron James’s photographic memory:
"LeBron will take one look at it the tv and know what game it
is. He'll be like, 'Oh, that's Game 2 of the '97 Finals,' before they even put
it on the screen."
This sounded very similar to an ESPN article
about Peyton Manning’s memory last week:
"Sometimes I can't remember if I checked a door at my
house to see if it's locked or not," he said. "But I can remember a
seam route to Marvin Harrison in 1999."
They must be long lost cousins or something! All joking
aside, the two great players’ careers have strikingly a lot common:
- Peyton has struggled in the big game, going 1-2 in the Super Bowl, while Lebron is only 2-3 in the NBA Finals
- Lebron was crushed in the most lopsided NBA Finals ever, while Peyton was blown out of the Super Bowl 43-8
- Peyton has led both the Heat and Cavs to the Finals, while Peyton has taken both the Colts and Broncos to the Super Bowl
- Lebron’s former boss is Hall of Famer Pat Riley who has six rings, while Peyton’s boss is Hall of Famer John Elway, who has two titles
- Peyton appeared on the cover of Sports Illustrated before he was drafted #1 overall in 1998, same with Lebron in 2003
- Lebron has been thwarted and compared many times to future Hall of Fame player and coach Tim Duncan and Gregg Popovich, while Peyton struggled and is contrasted with future Hall of Fame player and coach Tom Brady and Bill Belichick
- Lebron finally won his first title in his ninth season, same with Peyton
- Peyton’s free agency was the hot topic of the summer of 2012, while Lebron’s free agency decisions of 2010 and 2014 were national news
- Both have receding hairlines
- Peyton's "Achilles Heel" is his neck, while Lebron suffers from leg cramps
- Both met their wives while in high school
- Both have appeared on SNL and the Simpsons
- Peyton's success in Indianapolis helped the city get a new stadium, while Cleveland's economy is half-jokingly based on Lebron
Labels:
Cavaliers,
Cleveland,
Denver Broncos,
Lebron James,
Peyton Manning
Friday, July 11, 2014
The Return of the King: Lebron James is coming back to Cleveland!
After ripping out Cleveland fans’ hearts four years ago in “The Decision,” Lebron James decided today to come back to the Cavaliers. Instead of a television ESPN show, Lebron wrote an essay with Sports Illustrated which seemed heartfelt. “My relationship with Northeast Ohio is bigger than basketball. I didn't realize that four years ago. I do now.” Much better than taking your talents to South Beach.
Three months ago, Cleveland missed the playoffs while Lebron and the Heat were headed into the playoffs looking to defend their title. It appeared that there was zero percent Lebron would be returning to the Cavaliers. How did this change?
- 0% - At end of the regular season the Cavs finished a disappointing season at 33-49.
- 1% - Despite only a 1.7% chance, Cleveland won the draft lottery for the third time in four years. Not only could the Cavaliers draft another top draft pick, but they could trade it for a proven star to entice Lebron to return.
- 5% - In the NBA Finals, the Heat got crushed in the last three games, which exposed Miami as an aging team whose championship window was closing.
- 10% - Lebron and his Heat teammates opted out of their contracts, making him a free agent. While it was still believed it was just a salary cap move to bring in more players, Lebron was no longer employed by Miami.
- 15% - The Cavs resigned their All-Star point guard, Kyrie Irving, which showed that the franchise’s current building block was in place for the future.
- 25% - A week after opting out, Lebron’s agent only met with a handful of teams, including the Cavaliers.
- 50% - This morning after all the meetings, moves, and rumors, it appeared there was a 50/50 chance Lebron would come to Cleveland.
Leading up to his announcement, there were all sorts of crazy rumors and signs that Lebron was coming back to Cleveland. Cavalier fans, bloggers, and reporters obsessed over any minute detail as if they were solving a crime.
- Bloggers tracked Cavaliers’ owner Dan Gilbert’s plane as it went to Florida and back.
- There were pictures of moving trucks outside Lebron’s Miami home.
- Former Heat teammate Mike Miller posted a picture of himself working out with a Lebron Cleveland jersey in the background.
- There were random changes to Lebron’s website and twitter bio, and the site even crashed when it was rumored he would announce via his site.
- The Akron police department was given a heads up to be prepared, therefore huge crowds gathered by Lebron’s Akron home.
All this obsession shows how much Cleveland fans are passionate about their sports and how dearly they want a championship. It has been much discussed how Cleveland has not won a title in any sport since 1965, but they got a lot closer today. While I doubt the Cavaliers are going to go to four straight NBA Finals or win a title right away, having the best player in the world certainly helps.
On a personal note, I was crushed when Lebron left four years ago. I stopped watching the NBA Playoffs and I took down my pictures in front of the “Witness” billboard. However, I did not burn or throw away my Lebron jerseys or “Witness” shirt. While I am still pissed at “The Decision”, being closer to winning a championship is better than winning the draft lottery, so I welcome him back.
If that was not enough, the Cavaliers drafted UVa star Joe Harris in the second round two weeks ago as well. I was going to follow him and root for whatever team he was going to be on anyways. Now, the player I cheered for as he brought the Virginia Cavaliers an ACC title for the first time in 30 years will be hitting threes for the Cleveland Cavaliers.
Oh, and don’t forget about Johnny Football.
Cleveland sports just got a lot more exciting.
Friday, June 27, 2014
USA Soccer vs The World
Every four years during the World Cup, there is the inevitable debate about why the United States is not more successful in international soccer. Considering the size of the country and our sports-obsessed culture, we would figure to be dominant in soccer as well. The common answer is that the most popular sport in the world is not the most popular sport in the USA and that our best athletes play in other sports. However, if all our best athletes played one sport, we would decline in other sports. What is the tradeoff? What are the other sports?
Looking at several rankings, the most popular sports in the world are:
Soccer
Cricket
Tennis
Basketball
Baseball
Hockey
Volleyball
Ping Pong/Table Tennis
Golf
American Football
Using international governing bodies rankings (like FIFA and FIBA) as well as various individual rankings (like ATP and PGA players countries of origin), below is how countries rank in the ten sports above (click to enlarge):
The United States has the most top ten rankings with seven. Also, the USA has the top ranked team in four sports, no other country has more than one. We have six teams in the top five, no other country has more than three.
What about the more all-encompassing world sporting event, the Olympics? Well, when looking at the total medal count in the past three winter and summer games, we have not been too shabby either:
Therefore, before we get all bent out of shape that USA Soccer is only ranked #13 and backed into being one of the 16 teams remaining in the World Cup, keep in mind our overall sports dominance.
Well, except cricket. According to the USA Cricket team’s Wikipedia page, “There are only five official cricket pitches in the United States and only three of the players on the cricket team are born in the United States.” That’s not a wicked googly.
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Could Johnny Football become Johnny Cleveland?
As the NFL Draft on Thursday nears, I thought it was a good time to assess the Brown’s options. Once again, Cleveland is coming off of a disappointing year and will draft fourth overall. Luckily the Browns have seven picks in the first four rounds to help improve the team. Cleveland filled some of their team needs by signing Ben Tate (RB), Karlos Dansby (LB), and Donte Whitner (CB) during the offseason, but still have a glaring hole at QB. While Brian Hoyer showed some flashes last season, the Browns could draft a QB for the long term future.
Drafting in the first round has not been Cleveland’s strong suit recently since their return in 1999. If you take a quick glance at the players below, you can see why the Browns might be best served by trading down in the first round while still getting a QB later in the draft.
Given this putrid history, there is no guarantee a non-QB will be successful anyways, so why not go for the polarizing QB Johnny “Football” Manziel? While WR Sammy Watkins is another rumored pick, who is going to throw the ball to him and All-Pro Josh Gordon? Drafting the former Heisman winner will certainly boost interest and sales for a franchise that has averaged 24th in attendance the past five years and has not had a player in the top 25 in jersey sales in three years. There are certainly plenty of positives to his game, including making/extending plays with his feet, while still throwing 63 TDs/22 Ints with 69% completion % in the SEC. His detractors point out his 6’1” height and the increased abilities of NFL defenders to track him down and cause turnovers. Will he be the next Russell Wilson or the next Tim Tebow? Only time will tell. He certainly will join an exclusive club:
Labels:
Browns,
Cleveland,
Johnny Football,
Johnny Manziel,
NFL,
NFL Draft
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
NCAA March Madness Time!
Tomorrow is one of the best sports days of the year as the NCAA men’s basketball tournament begins. Usually I just focus on upsets, good games, picking the best bracket, etc. However, this year this year there is an extra incentive, as UVa capped off their ACC regular season championship with an ACC tournament title, earning a #1 seed in the East region. It was the first ACC regular season championship outright and #1 seed for the Cavs in over 30 years, and the first Tournament title since 1976. Now, do I follow my heart and pick the Hoo’s to win it all or do I listen to the experts and try to be more accurate with my bracket predictions?
First let’s take look at the trends from the past 28 seasons by round.
First round:
Second round:
Sweet 16:
Elite Eight:
If you add up all the seeds that make the final four, the average total is 10. Meaning if you pick all #1 seeds, that’s less than half the average, or if you throw in a #11 George Mason with a #3, #2, and #1, that’s double the average. (Last year’s total of 18 (#1, #4, #4, #9) was way above average.)
If those are the yearly trends, then who did the experts pick this year? Here is a breakdown of 22 “expert” brackets.
Championship:
Runner Up:
Final Four:
Elite Eight:
Sweet Sixteen:
Conclusions
After looking at the trends and expert picks I am even more inclined to pick UVa to win it all. If the entire pool picks MSU, Louisville, etc, I gain an advantage by picking UVa if they win, while not gaining anything by picking against Virginia. The consensus of the expert picks is staggering though. Using the Ken Pomeroy rankings (the en vogue college basketball sabermetrics rankings), UVa is the #4th best team in the country while MSU is #10. Granted Michigan State is now fully healthy and coming off a BIG 10 tournament title and they may be underseeded as a #4. However, they have gone 8-7 in their past 15 games, while UVa has only one loss in a meaningful game since New Year’s. Historic trends have #1 seeds advancing 70% of the time in this matchup, while only 16% of #4 seeds, but the 22 experts picked 9% #1 seed/91% #4 seed.
Meanwhile on the other side of the region, which team do you think got 95% of the picks to make the elite eight? The #7 ranked team or the #22, #25, or #26 ranked teams? Iowa State, the #22 ranked team, was predicted to win in 21 of the 22 brackets, while #7 Villanova got zero.
Either the experts or on to something that I do not know about, or maybe I found out a key to who I am picking this week. That’s why they play the games.
First let’s take look at the trends from the past 28 seasons by round.
First round:
- #12 seeds upset the #5 seeds 36% of the time (last year it was 75% with #12 seeds Mississippi, California, and Oregon pulling off the upsets)
- 21% of #4 seeds go down (#4 Kansas State went home early last year)
- Meanwhile only 14% of #3 seeds lose their first game (last year #3 New Mexico was upset though)
Second round:
- Only 12% of #1 seeds were upset (#1 Gonzaga was upset by eventual Final Four team Wichita St, who happen to be undefeated this year)
- Meanwhile 36% of #2 seeds have been upset by the #7/#10 winner (#2 Georgetown was upset by the #15 last year, not even getting to the #7/#10)
- Only 12% of the time has a region gone #1, #2, #3, #4 (which actually did happen once last year)
Sweet 16:
- 70% of #1 seeds make the elite eight (was 25% last year with only champion Louisville advancing)
- On the other side of the region, 72% are either #2 or #3 seeds (100% last year)
Elite Eight:
- Only one time in 33 years of the 64 team bracket has all four #1 seeds made the Final Four (which was no exception last year)
- 41% of #1 seeds make the Final Four (only one #1 seed made it last year)
- #2 seeds make it 21% of the time (no #2 seeds made it last year)
If you add up all the seeds that make the final four, the average total is 10. Meaning if you pick all #1 seeds, that’s less than half the average, or if you throw in a #11 George Mason with a #3, #2, and #1, that’s double the average. (Last year’s total of 18 (#1, #4, #4, #9) was way above average.)
If those are the yearly trends, then who did the experts pick this year? Here is a breakdown of 22 “expert” brackets.
Championship:
- 32% of the experts chose #1 seed Florida to win the entire thing (compared to 75% for eventual champ Louisville last year)
- UVa was the only #1 seed not picked of the six different teams
- 27% picked #4 Michigan State with 8 losses while only 9% picked undefeated #1 Wichita State
Runner Up:
- 7 different teams were chosen to lose the title game
- 31% #4 Louisville was the highest
- 22% have Florida over Louisville
Final Four:
- 86% picked #4 Michigan State to reach the Final Four, while only 1 expert picked UVa
- Only 27% picked #1 Wichita State, while 55% picked #4 Louisville, out of the Midwest Region
- #1 Florida 68%, #2 Kansas 32% in what looks an entertaining South regional Final
- Sorry Wildcats fans, Villanova was the only #2 seed not picked
- No teams outside of the top #4 seeds were picked, how boring
Elite Eight:
- 100% of brackets picked Florida in the Elite Eight
- 90% have #4 MSU facing #3 Iowa State, which is absurd considering only 16% of #4 seeds and 26% of #3 seeds even make the Elite Eight
- #4 Louisville and #1 Wichita State are split 60/40
- Only 9% picked UVa, the lowest #1 seed, and 0% for #2 seed Villanova
Sweet Sixteen:
- 23% have Kentucky beating #1 Wichita State, but only one bracket had #4 MSU or #3 Iowa State losing
- All 20 experts picked #4 Louisville to make the Sweet 16, stunning considering half the #4 seeds do not make it there
- #2 Kansas 55% vs. #7 New Mexico 45% looks like a great game
- Same with #2 Villanova 55% vs. #7 UConn 40%
Conclusions
- Since 30% of #1 seeds do not make the Elite 8, UVa or Wichita St. are the choices to falter.
- Since 54% of #2 seeds do not make the Elite 8 either, Villanova and Kansas have the toughest opponents.
- Only 52% of #3 seeds make it out of the first two rounds, so experts pick against Creighton as a #3 seed to continue this trend.
- Since only one time out of 34 has a Final Four been all #1 seeds, experts think UVa and Wichita St. look the most vulnerable.
After looking at the trends and expert picks I am even more inclined to pick UVa to win it all. If the entire pool picks MSU, Louisville, etc, I gain an advantage by picking UVa if they win, while not gaining anything by picking against Virginia. The consensus of the expert picks is staggering though. Using the Ken Pomeroy rankings (the en vogue college basketball sabermetrics rankings), UVa is the #4th best team in the country while MSU is #10. Granted Michigan State is now fully healthy and coming off a BIG 10 tournament title and they may be underseeded as a #4. However, they have gone 8-7 in their past 15 games, while UVa has only one loss in a meaningful game since New Year’s. Historic trends have #1 seeds advancing 70% of the time in this matchup, while only 16% of #4 seeds, but the 22 experts picked 9% #1 seed/91% #4 seed.
Meanwhile on the other side of the region, which team do you think got 95% of the picks to make the elite eight? The #7 ranked team or the #22, #25, or #26 ranked teams? Iowa State, the #22 ranked team, was predicted to win in 21 of the 22 brackets, while #7 Villanova got zero.
Either the experts or on to something that I do not know about, or maybe I found out a key to who I am picking this week. That’s why they play the games.
Labels:
Bracket,
Cavaliers,
final four,
Michigan State,
NCAA Basketball,
tournament,
UVA,
Virginia
Thursday, February 27, 2014
UVa’s Men’s Basketball’s Historic Season Reaches New Heights This Weekend Against Syracuse
Last night, #12 UVa’s men’s basketball team cruised to their 12th straight victory and 15th in the last 16 games. The Cavaliers now have a 15-1 ACC record and are in first place by 1.5 games over #4 Syracuse, which comes into Charlottesville on Saturday. The Wahoo’s can extend their magical season by claiming their 2nd outright ACC title ever with a win. Here are some stats on how historic this season has been for Virginia:
- The last time they won an ACC title outright was in 1981, over 30 years ago
- It’s the first time the program has won 12 straight ACC games since 1981-82
- UVa also improved to 19 games above .500 for the first time since 1982-83
- They won a program-record 11th ACC game by double figures.
- The Hoos have won 17 straight home ACC games, a new school record
- They have led by 19 or more in 12 of 16 ACC games
How has a team that did not make the NCAA tournament last year and was not ranked until three weeks ago able to run rampant over the toughest conference in the country? It all starts with the defense:
- The Cavaliers have the #1 defense in the country in points per game and #8 in defensive FG%
- They have held 16 straight teams below their season average for points
- The offense is balanced as well, since seven different players have led the team in scoring
The game will be nationally televised on ESPN with Dickie V doing the commentary. It has been sold out for months with the cheapest nosebleed ticket currently going for $268 on Stubhub. ESPN already has video breaking down the match-up: http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10518180
The basketball game is not the only sports action in Charlottesville on Saturday though. After the game, across the street, the #4 men’s lacrosse team hosts the #6 team in the country. What rival successful lacrosse team warrants the night time matchup? You guessed it, Syracuse. Earlier in the day, UVa’s top #5 ranked baseball, tennis, and women's lacrosse teams are in action as well. Hopefully the Hoo’s can pull out the upset to continue their historic season and confirm my prophetic tweet from last March:
Monday, January 27, 2014
How do you beat Peyton Manning and the Denver Broncos in the Super Bowl?
MVP Peyton Manning and the Denver Broncos are the favorite in this week’s Super Bowl against the Seattle Seahawks. While Denver has had a record breaking season, they have been beaten three times. A little analysis below reveals how the Broncos have performed in their 15 wins and 3 losses:
In the wins: Plus 2 in the turnover margin
In the losses: Minus 4
In the wins: Only 30% of their drives ended in punts
In the losses: Up to 50%
In the wins: 40% of their drives ended with touchdowns
In the losses: Only 20%
In the wins: Three times more touchdowns than 3 & outs
In the losses: Had more 3 & outs than touchdowns
In the wins: Averaged 28 first downs on offense and gave up 20 on defense
In the losses: Averaged 23 first downs on offense and gave up 23 on defense
In the wins: Gave up 89 rushing yards on average
In the losses: Gave up 138 rushing yards on average
Therefore, in order for the Seahawks to prevent Peyton Manning from winning his second Super Bowl, they need to run the ball for first downs, while limiting the record setting Broncos offense to turnovers and 3 & outs on defense. Good luck.
Labels:
Denver Broncos,
Peyton Manning,
Seattle Seahawks,
Super Bowl
Friday, January 17, 2014
Peyton Manning vs Tom Brady is Upon Us
This Sunday, the biggest individual rivalry in professional sports repeats itself when Tom Brady leads the New England Patriots against Peyton Manning and the Denver Broncos in the AFC Championship Game. The two hall of fame bound quarterbacks face off for the 15th time and fourth time in the playoffs. In case you are not fed up with the non-stop coverage on ESPN, here are some different takes on the rivalry:
Here is a Sporcle quiz comparing their stats:
http://www.sporcle.com/games/klofton798/manning-vs-brady-stats
Here are some fun facts on the matchup:
- 6 of the last 7 Manning-Brady meetings have been decided by 7 points or less
- 7 of the last 12 Super Bowls have included either Tom Brady or Peyton Manning
- The last time the Patriots played a road playoff game? The 2006 AFC Championship Game against the Colts
- Peyton Manning & Tom Brady's combined age of 74.3 is the oldest ever between opposing starting QBs in a Conference Championship Game
- Manning and Brady will be the 1st QBs to meet in playoff games 10 seasons apart in the Super Bowl era (2003 & 2013 AFC Championship games).
Both Manning and Brady have appeared on the cover of Sports Illustrated over a dozen times:












Meanwhile, as pitchmen, they are completely different as this article details. Brady is married to a supermodel wife and endorses Ugg boots and Movado watches, while Manning and his “aww shucks” “down to earth” personality pitches Papa John’s and Mastercard.
I know what I’ll be watching at 3pm on Sunday… with my Papa John’s pizza.
Labels:
Denver Broncos,
New England,
Patriots,
Peyton Manning,
playoffs,
Tom Brady
Thursday, November 7, 2013
The Caps Specialize At Being Uneven
After crushing the Islanders 6-2 the other night, the Capitals are now the NHL leader in two important categories, Power Play
Percentage and Penalty Killing Percentage. The league average for scoring when you are in
the power play advantage is 18%, which Washington is leading at 28%. Looking
the other way, DC leads the NHL in preventing opponents from scoring on
the advantage at 8%, with the same 18% league average.
Controlling these key moments in the game correlates into
victories, as the top ten power play % teams and 8 of the top 10 penalty
killing teams currently have winning records. Only once in the past 8 seasons
has a team even finished in the top three in both categories at the end of the
year, and that team had the best record in the league and made the Cup Finals.
Then why are the Caps only 8-7? Well, when playing at even
numbers, they are below average. Washington has outscored opponents for the
season 50-42, but when at even strength they are being outscored 37-33. They
are the only team in the NHL with that oddity.
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
2-0 NFL Teams vs. 0-2 Teams
After two weeks of the NFL season, there are eight teams that are 2-0 and eight teams that are 0-2. I have seen the statistic several times today stating that 63% of teams that start 2-0 make the playoffs, while only 12% of 0-2 teams do. Now that 12% of the season is already done, which of the 2-0 teams should start printing out playoff tickets and which of the 0-2 teams should start working on their draft board?
First take a look at the eight teams that are off to a fast start, in multiple categories:
Since statistically only 63%, or 5 of these 8 will make the playoffs, which ones will advance? What is the best indicator of team success? The easiest trend is if the team made the playoffs last year, then they should make it again. However, half the teams on this list did not make it last year. Maybe last year was a fluke and the five year records will be a better predictor. Well Teams D and B have great percentages, while C and H have had several losing seasons recently. If “defense wins championships”, then certainly Teams C and H are in since they are among the tops in defensive yards and points allowed. The NFL is an offensive league now though, so the top offenses of Teams F and G are strong bets to make the playoffs. Game by game, winning the turnover battle is key, therefore Team C and H are starting the season off well, while Team A, B, and F need some work to do. After looking at these metrics overall, Teams C and G are playoff bound, while Teams A, B, and E will be the 3 in the 37% that do not make it.
Now for the teams on the other end of the spectrum, which started off 0-2:

Looking at the same metrics as before, Teams I and K made the playoffs last year and have above average scoring offenses, so maybe they can turn their seasons around. Team L and M are even in the turnover battle, and have above average scoring defenses. Teams J and O have great records in the past five years, so maybe they just got off to a rough start this season. Looking at the rankings overall, it looks like Team L has the best chance of being the one team to make the playoffs after a 0-2 start.
Here is the team key:

It’s not surprising that Seattle and Denver are the two best, but Chicago and New Orleans need more than history and fan base to get in. There is no guarantee Pittsburgh, NY Giants, or Washington are turning it around, while Tampa Bay’s defense and turnover margin can give their fans some hope.
First take a look at the eight teams that are off to a fast start, in multiple categories:
Since statistically only 63%, or 5 of these 8 will make the playoffs, which ones will advance? What is the best indicator of team success? The easiest trend is if the team made the playoffs last year, then they should make it again. However, half the teams on this list did not make it last year. Maybe last year was a fluke and the five year records will be a better predictor. Well Teams D and B have great percentages, while C and H have had several losing seasons recently. If “defense wins championships”, then certainly Teams C and H are in since they are among the tops in defensive yards and points allowed. The NFL is an offensive league now though, so the top offenses of Teams F and G are strong bets to make the playoffs. Game by game, winning the turnover battle is key, therefore Team C and H are starting the season off well, while Team A, B, and F need some work to do. After looking at these metrics overall, Teams C and G are playoff bound, while Teams A, B, and E will be the 3 in the 37% that do not make it.
Now for the teams on the other end of the spectrum, which started off 0-2:

Looking at the same metrics as before, Teams I and K made the playoffs last year and have above average scoring offenses, so maybe they can turn their seasons around. Team L and M are even in the turnover battle, and have above average scoring defenses. Teams J and O have great records in the past five years, so maybe they just got off to a rough start this season. Looking at the rankings overall, it looks like Team L has the best chance of being the one team to make the playoffs after a 0-2 start.
Here is the team key:

It’s not surprising that Seattle and Denver are the two best, but Chicago and New Orleans need more than history and fan base to get in. There is no guarantee Pittsburgh, NY Giants, or Washington are turning it around, while Tampa Bay’s defense and turnover margin can give their fans some hope.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Runningback’s Decline Not Just Due to Turning 30
In the world of fantasy football, there are many theories and
clichés to predict a player’s rise and fall. The “third
year receiver”, “handcuff”
your runningback, and “avoid kickers and defenses” theories are common, and I
have even written about the “30 year old RB wall” one previously. Further research goes beyond just the
age of RB’s, but at carries and performance to predict their decline as well.
When looking runningback stats from the past 13 seasons,
there are some interesting trends about the decline of a RB’s performance from
year to year. There are certain
benchmarks signifying a good season that RB’s strive to meet year to year.
- Since 2000, there have been 123 10 rushing touchdown seasons, but only 49 (40%) of those RB’s got at least 10 TD’s the next year.
- Of the RB’s who were in the top #10 in scoring that year, only 47 (39%) were in the top #10 the following season.
- 63 RB’s scored 150 fantasy points or more in a season, with only 21 (33%) reaching that mark the next year.
- The 1,500 yard rushing mark has been eclipsed 51 times, but only repeated 13 times or 25%.
What does this mean for last year’s RB’s? Four RB’s had
seasons last year that fit each of the criteria above, Adrian Peterson, Arian
Foster, Marshawn Lynch, and Frank Gore. Following
the percentages above, only one or two of those RB’s will reach those
benchmarks again. Frank Gore has played
seven full seasons and is already 30, and Lynch had never been over 1500 yards
or 150 points before in his six year career, so they are good bets from that group
to regress.
There is another factor to look at besides players peaking,
which is the amount of carries. Runningbacks take a pounding carrying the ball throughout
the season, and thus have shorter careers as compared to quarterbacks or wide receivers.
This wear and tear leads to decreasing point
production the following year.
- Since 2000, there have been 21 RB’s that carried the ball 370+ times in a season, and 19 (90%) of them had a decrease in points the next season for an average of 40% less points.
- 34 RB’s with 350+ carries, with 28 (82%) decreasing an average of 36%.
- 49 340+ carries, with 41 (84%) decreasing an average of 50%.
- 104 300+ carries, with 73 (70%) decreasing an average of 48%.
As far as last year’s RB’s go, Foster and Peterson had 370+
carries, while Lynch had 340+ and Gore had 300+. Ray Rice had 340+ carries and
met some of the earlier criteria as well. Two other RB’s got 300+ carries but
were rookies or second year players, Doug Martin and Stevan Ridley. Following the percentages, you would expect
all of these RB’s, except the two young ones, to see a decrease in point totals
next year.
Therefore, when it comes to draft day, I would avoid some of
these workhorses who are not likely to repeat their performances and opt for
younger RB’s who are coming into their primes.
Labels:
Adrian Peterson,
Arian Foster,
Fantasy Football,
FFL,
FFL Draft,
Frank Gore,
Marshawn Lynch,
stats
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)